I assume that different coaches prefer to approach things differently.
I'm not writing a book, but I am assuming that some climbing coaches may have particular exercises that they favor over others and tend to prescribe their tips in ways that may be interesting. This is what I'm interested in, the variation of answers we may get in response to the questions. Perhaps some coaches have even invented exercises or analogies that are not found in the books and found them productive. If so, wouldn't you love to hear what they are? They may also describe things in a way that is more understandable than the books have. If I recognize this, I can then adopt their approach as opposed to the one that I may have been using if their way of explaining things seems more understandable.
For example, I have not heard of the refrigerator or spaghetti noodle theories Brannon explained. These both seem like effective analogies and I actually used them to help a climber today. So I really appreciate that reply. And I've heard of the ladder analogy that Barth submitted, but I've never heard it explained so clearly or proposed to the climber as a question ("When you climb a ladder do you do pull-ups or chin-ups?"). This is quite clever, because it forces the climber to internalize the concept when they need to answer that question. After they do this, you can remind them of it while they climb and they'll understand what you're asking them to do. Like I said, I also liked Barth's explanation, so I'll probably explain it more like the way he did than the way I usually do.
I have the books you mentioned, among about 15 others. Thanks for referring me to them anyways, if I didn't have them that would be extremely helpful. Those two are outstanding.
However, I'm not interested in authoritative references for answers to these questions. I'm interested in the unique ways that different coaches may answer them.